Aon Political Risk Map 2014 viser, at BRICS-landende står overfor øget risiko
BRICS countries facing increasing political risk says Aon
• Volatility in Ukraine impacting on other former Soviet states
• Aon’s Political Risk Map data and analysis shows the BRICS countries have an increased risk rating
LONDON (10 April 2014) – Aon Risk Solutions, the global risk management business of Aon plc (NYSE: AON), today unveiled its 2014 Political Risk Map which identifies an increased risk rating for all five emerging market BRICS countries. As a result, countries representing a large share of global output experienced a broad-based increase in political risk including political violence, government interference and sovereign non-payment risk.
• Brazil's rating was downgraded; political risks have been increasing from moderate levels as economic weakness has increased the role of the government in the economy. This is of particular concern given this year’s World Cup and the 2016 Olympics.
• Russia’s rating was downgraded largely due to recent developments with the Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea. Political strains and focus on geopolitical issues have exacerbated an already weak operating environment for business and exchange transfer risks have increased following the risk of new capital controls. Russia’s economy continues to be dominated by the government, so economic policy deadlock has brought growth to a standstill and with it an increase in the risk of political violence.
• India’s rating was downgraded with legal and regulatory risks elevated by ongoing corruption and moderately high levels of political interference. Territorial disputes, terrorism, and regional and ethnic conflicts also contribute to elevated risks of political violence.
• China’s rating was downgraded to moderately high. This deterioration in political risk, including an increase in political violence, has occurred at a time of slowing economic growth, which suggests that the economic policy deadlock and economic sluggishness are mutually reinforcing.
• South Africa’s rating was downgraded; despite having strong political institutions, South Africa is struggling from recurrent strikes, which have become the major means of wage setting, and which weaken the outlook for business and raise financing costs.
Matthew Shires, Head of Political Risk, Aon Risk Solutions, said “By using the latest data and analysis capabilities, Aon’s interactive online map provides clients with unprecedented clarity when assessing their emerging markets political risks. By way of an example, the volatile situation in the Ukraine began to be highlighted in our quarterly updates in mid 2013. These quarterly updates assist our clients’ in their strategic and financial decision-making. The degree of risk and exposures vary considerably in the emerging markets and this highlights the need for institutions to be able to generate their own high level overview of political risk and how it affects them; for this they need access to a sophisticated risk tool such as the online map.”
Leading data, analytics and insight from a leading team
The map measures political risk in 163 countries and territories, in order to help companies assess and analyse their exposure to exchange transfer, legal and regulatory risk, political interference, political violence, sovereign non-payment and supply chain disruption. Aon’s long-standing strength in Political Risk management is complemented by partnering with Roubini Global Economics (RGE), an independent, global research firm founded in 2004 by renowned economist Nouriel Roubini, in order to take advantage of RGE’s unique methodology.
Paul Domjan, Managing Director, Roubini Country Insights, said “Roubini Global Economics is proud to continue to partner with Aon to deliver this insightful approach to mapping political risk and political violence for its clients. This year the political risks in emerging markets have risen, particularly in the some of the largest economies. Our quarterly scores give an updated picture of developing risks, helping investors respond quickly to deteriorating balance sheets and better hedge their exposure. Once again, the map demonstrates the power of combining RGE's country analysis and benchmarking with Aon's expertise in country risk.”
Deterioration in Commonwealth of Independent States:
In early 2013, we identified some improvements in the Caucasus, Armenia and Azerbaijan, which have continued. The rest of the region has weakened. Russia’s rating was downgraded largely due to recent developments with the Ukraine. This volatility is also affecting other former soviet states including Armenia, Belarus, Georgia and Moldova.
Ukraine’s position deteriorated throughout 2013, which culminated in a downgrade to High risk in Q3 from Medium High. The annexation of Crimea by Russia, and government collapse was already consistent with a country with a high political risk, but the implications of these developments warranted a further downgrade in political risk – Ukraine is now a Very High risk country. Exchange transfer risks, which are already very high will be further increased by restrictions in the financial system. Further, the willingness and ability of the country to settle its debts may be affected. Meanwhile the weakening of global demand for base metals has hit government revenues and weakened its ability to stimulate the economy. In addition to uncertainty regarding the status of Crimea, Russia’s desire for federalization in Ukraine, will provide flashpoints. RGE’s baseline assumes that there will be some de-escalation of tensions short of war, but Russia will be likely to continue to de-stabilize eastern Ukraine. The upcoming presidential election will present a source of economic and political uncertainty.
Divergence Widening within Middle East and North and West Africa: Developments in 2013 have reinforced the relative strength of the richer oil exporting MENA countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Compare this to their North African peers, all of whom have fewer financial resources with which to manage any shocks, they all continue to have higher risk scores across all elements of political risk tracked by Aon. The three countries upgraded in 2013’s risk map (Bahrain, Oman and UAE), maintained their more resilient and lower risk outlook, while Jordan, where Syrian refugees have exacerbated domestic shocks, was downgraded.
Sub-Saharan Africa Divergence: There are some improvements in Sub-Saharan Africa, notably in Ghana and Uganda which offset deterioration in South Africa and Swaziland, which were both downgraded. Although Ghana has fiscal overspending and rising inflation, which is weakening its macroeconomic stability, increases in revenues and investment reinforced its already strong political institutions. Uganda continues to suffer from an overly centralized government and significant human rights issues, the stabilization of donor finance improved its ability and willingness to pay debts and reduced political interference.
By contrast political conditions deteriorated, particularly in Swaziland, which is being supported by its neighbours financially, and suffered a broad-based increase in political risk and economic strain which added to expropriation risk. South Africa, despite having strong political institutions is struggling from recurrent strikes, which have become the major means of wage setting, and which weaken the outlook for business.
Key flashpoint risks and trends to watch for 2014
The combination of Aon’s focus on data and analytics, and RGE’s unique Country Insights methodology, has highlighted the following key points to watch in 2014:
• Exchange Transfer: Economic recovery in developed markets and the beginning of interest rate normalization has the effect of drawing capital back from emerging markets. This adds pressure to countries with weak external balances. The increase in political risk in some of the larger emerging market countries has weakened long-term capital (FDI) increasing the risk of measures being introduced to retain capital that will impede transfers of funds/repatriation of assets.
• Sovereign Non-Payment: as fiscal balances weaken and default risks rise, in countries like Ukraine, along with foreign exchange pressure, corporations will see a change in certain sovereigns’ willingness and ability to pay. Aon’s Political Risk Map tracks both and highlights this weakness early.
• The heavy global election cycle in 2014 could exacerbate political violence, government intervention and policy implementation risk.
2014 upgrades and downgrades in Country Ratings:
Upgrades (where the overall country or territory risk is rated lower than the previous year)
6 upgrades (2013: 13 upgrades): Ghana, Haiti, Laos, Philippines, Suriname, Uganda
Downgrades (where the overall country or territory risk is rated higher than the previous year)
16 downgrades (2013: 12 downgrades): Brazil, China, Eritrea, India, Jordan, Kiribati, Micronesia, Moldova, Russia, Samoa, South Africa, Swaziland, Tonga, Tuvalu, Ukraine and Vanuatu.
This year’s 22 Country Rating changes compared to 25 in 2013. RGE’s Country Insight scores capture a series of small changes on a quarterly basis, which can give an early warning of changes. Any changes in grade are delivered quarterly and allow the Political Risk Map to highlight deterioration in countries, such as with the Ukraine several quarters in advance.
Each country on the map is rated according to the different types of risks it faces. These risks are indicated by the individual icons, with the first six icons driving the overall country rating, and the three new icons included for additional information.
Brief Descriptions of Each Risk Icon
Country ratings on the map derive from six core Risk Icons, which represent insurable risk and these are;
Exchange Transfer: The risk of being unable to make hard currency payments as a result of the imposition of local currency controls. This risk looks at various economic factors, including measures of capital account restrictions, the country’s de-facto exchange rate regime and foreign exchange reserves. This Risk Icon has been added to 25 countries and territories, including Namibia, Nepal, and South Africa. This Risk Icon has been removed from 5 countries including Bangladesh, Mongolia, and Uganda. 107 countries have this Icon.
Sovereign Non-Payment: The risk of failure of a foreign government or government entity to honour its obligations in connection with loans or other financial commitments. This risk looks at measures of both ability and willingness to pay, including fiscal policy, political risk and rule of law. This Risk Icon has been added to 22 countries and territories including Gabon, Moldova and South Africa. This Risk Icon has been removed from 4 countries, including Belarus, Malawi and Montenegro. 108 countries have this Icon.
Political Interference: The risk of host government intervention in the economy or other policy areas that adversely affect overseas business interests; e.g., nationalization and expropriation. This risk is composed of various measures of social, institutional and regulatory risks. This Risk Icon has been added to 6 countries and territories including India, Mozambique, and Cape Verde. This Risk Icon has been removed from 2 countries: Bangladesh and Benin. 85 countries have this Icon.
Supply Chain Disruption: The risk of disruption to the flow of goods and/or services into or out of a country as a result of political, social, economic or environmental instability. From 2013, this includes an assessment of domestic supply chain risk. This Risk Icon has been added to 20 countries and territories, including Bahrain, Macedonia, and Rwanda. This Risk Icon has been removed from 4 countries including Jamaica, Montenegro, and Saudi Arabia. 116 countries have this Icon.
Legal and Regulatory: The risk of financial or reputational loss as a result of difficulties in complying with a host country's laws, regulations or codes. This risk comprises measures of government effectiveness, rule of law, wider property rights and regulatory quality. This Risk Icon has been added to 17 countries and territories including Colombia, Morocco, and Peru. This Risk Icon has been removed from 2 countries: Thailand and Zambia. 110 countries have this Icon.
Political Violence: The risk of strikes, riots, civil commotions, sabotage, terrorism, malicious damage, war, civil war, rebellion, revolution, insurrection, a hostile act by a belligerent power, mutiny or a coup d'etat. Political violence is quantified using measures of political stability, peacefulness and specific acts of violence. This Risk Icon has been added to 19 countries and territories, including Belize, Indonesia, and Ukraine. This Risk Icon has been removed from 5 countries, including Armenia, Serbia, and Timor Leste. 104 countries have this Icon.
Risks to Doing Business: The regulatory obstacles to setting up and operating business in the country, such as excessive procedures, the time and cost of registering a new business, dealing with building permits, trading across borders and getting bank credit with sound business plans. This Risk Icon has been added to 8 countries and territories, including Botswana, Pakistan, and Senegal. This Risk Icon has been removed from 8 countries, including El Salvador, Seychelles, and Zambia. 97 countries have this Icon.
Banking Sector Vulnerability: The risk of a country’s domestic banking sector going into crisis or it not being able to support economic growth with adequate credit. This risk comprises measures of the capitalization and strength of the banking sector, and macro-financial linkages such as total indebtedness, trade performance and labor market rigidity. This Risk Icon has been added to 13 countries and territories, including Botswana, Pakistan, and Senegal. This Risk Icon has been removed from 13 countries, including Barbados, Dominican Republic, and Ghana. 108 countries have this Icon.
Risks to Fiscal Stimulus: The risk of the government not being able to stimulate the economy due to lack of fiscal credibility, declining reserves, high debt burden or government inefficiency. This Risk Icon has been added to 12 countries and territories, including Afghanistan, Iran, and Panama. This Risk Icon has been removed from 11 countries, including Burkina Faso, Iraq, and Vietnam. 97 countries have this Icon.
The map can be accessed at aon.com/2014politicalriskmap
Notes to Editors:
About the 2014 Aon Political Risk Map
Aon measures political risk in 163 countries and territories to assess the risks associated with exchange transfer, sovereign non-payment, political interference, supply chain disruption, legal and regulatory regimes, political violence, ease of doing business, banking sector vulnerability and governments’ capability to provide fiscal stimulus. In each specific risk category, as well as the overall rating, each country is rated as Low, Medium-Low, Medium, Medium-High, High or Very High. Member countries of the European Union and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development are not rated in the 2014 map.
Country ratings reflect a combination of analysis by Aon Risk Solutions, Roubini Global Economics – a global analysis and advisory firm – and the opinions of 26 Lloyd’s syndicates and corporate insurers actively writing political risk insurance.
The online interactive map has data going back over 16 years and also measures banking sector vulnerability, risk to fiscal stimulus and risk of doing business. By accessing Aon’s Interactive Map, institutions can track their specific political risk exposures in emerging markets, both on a current and historical basis.
Aon plc (NYSE:AON) is the leading global provider of risk management, insurance and reinsurance brokerage, and human resources solutions and outsourcing services. Through its more than 66,000 colleagues worldwide, Aon unites to empower results for clients in over 120 countries via innovative and effective risk and people solutions and through industry-leading global resources and technical expertise. Aon has been named repeatedly as the world’s best broker, best insurance intermediary, reinsurance intermediary, captives manager and best employee benefits consulting firm by multiple industry sources. Visit www.aon.com for more information on Aon and www.aon.com/manchesterunited to learn
Aon Denmark er en del af Aon plc. En førende global professionel rådgivningsvirksomhed med en bred vifte af risiko-, pensions- og sundhedsløsninger. Vores 50.000 kolleger i 120 lande styrker resultater for kunder ved at bruge proprietære data og analyser til at levere indsigt, der reducerer volatiliteten og forbedrer ydeevnen.
I Danmark har vi tre kontorer - i København, Kolding og Århus - hvor et team på 180 dygtige og engagerede mennesker betjener et bredt udsnit af danske og internationale virksomheder.
Aon er en hovedpartner for Manchester United